It’s a revised version of my post from a couple weeks ago, “WSJ Op-Ed Reaches Acceptable Conclusion on False Premises.” Link is here:
Hopefully this will inspire better proposals from reformers.
Filed under: Am Law Daily Post Tagged: | California, J.D. Overproduction, Legal Education, Legal Education ROI, Legal Sector
But I Did Everything Right! Fluster Cucked The Forgotten Attorney Law Lemmings Law School Scambusting Resources Law School Truth Center Life’s Mockery Outside Lies Magic: A Law School Vendetta Outside the Law School Scam Super-Duper: The Non-Tradiational Law Student Confidence Game Third Tier Reality All Education Matters Class Bias in Higher Education DEFAULT: The Student Loan Documentary J.URIS D.EBTOR Law Students for a Fair Profession Legally Obligated Prepas Law Blog Scholastic Snake Oil Student Debt Emergency Studentpwns TaxProf Blog: Legal Education The Belly of the Beast The Legal Dollar Do as I Say, Not as I Do First Tier Toilet ! Restoring Dignity to the Law Rose Colored Glasses
Since the ABA clearly has no problem pumping out FAR TOO MANY graduates, for the available number of attorney and law-related positions each year, then they should not be ideologicaly opposed to allowing any college graduate to sit for the bar exam. (Furthermore, it is rather well-known that law schools do not teach students to practice law.) The review prep courses will presumably be happy to teach larger classes.
Of course, deans at ABA-approved law schools would rather die of ebola than allow this to occur. Remember, these swine do not operate in a “free market.” They simply want to rake in all of those billion$ in federally-backed student loans every, single year.